Everise Insights

Why Even Strong AEP Payer Operations Struggle with Maintaining Member Experience

Written by Frank Ortiz | Mar 27, 2026

Medicare Advantage member satisfaction dropped to 623 out of 1,000 in 2025, the steepest single-year decline J.D. Power has recorded, with fewer than 40% of first-year members saying their service expectations were met. This is not a design problem since most payers know their benefits are competitive.

The gap lives where payer operations end and the member experience begins: At the enrollment call, the question that takes too long to answer, the transfer that ends in silence. The gap is real, measurable, and costly, but most payers don't see it until the damage is done.

Why a Lot of Payers Struggle with Maintaining
Member Experience During AEP
 

AEP is not just a busy season. It is a structurally high-risk operational event and exposes vulnerabilities that normal operations never reveal.

  • The Surge Reality

    In seven weeks, payers must field a year’s worth of medical enrollment decisions. Call volume spikes sharply, timelines compress, and every operational gap becomes amplified. There is no grace period since the window opens October 15 and closes December 7, and every day of underperformance has enrollment consequences.

  • The Member Profile

    The members calling during AEP are primarily seniors navigating complex plan options under time pressure. They weigh premiums, formularies, provider networks, and out-of-pocket maximums—often for the first time, and often alone. They need patience and expertise, and speed-to-close is the wrong metric.

    A 2026 Medicare Member Experience Study found that 21% of Medicare Advantage seniors were dissatisfied and considering switching plans entering the 2026 AEP—the third consecutive record for Medicare Advantage switching. Members who feel unsupported at enrollment do not stay.

  • The Regulatory Layer

    Every medical call is a compliance event.

    CMS governs what agents can say, what incentives can be offered, and how plan comparisons are conducted. The updated medical enrollment and disenrollment guidance took effect January 1, 2026. Non-compliance is not a quality issue; it is a regulatory one, with audit and financial consequences.

 

Four Reasons Payer Operations Break Down

Most payers heading into AEP are operationally prepared but often fail to realize that operation breakdowns occur at the interaction layer: the point where a member reaches an agent and expects to be guided to the right plan. Operational readiness does not transfer to conversation quality and when it breaks down, the consequences are direct and quantifiable.

  1. Seasonal scale-up floods the operation with undertrained
    agents at peak volume, precisely when member interactions are most complex.

    Many payer operations build their staffing models around an assumed re-enrollment rate, projecting that a reliable percentage of the prior season's members will return. When that assumption proves wrong, the gap between projected and actual volume hits an operation that is already stretched and undertrained agents are left to handle the most complex plan discussions. The downstream cost is immediate: lower conversion rates, direct revenue foregone for the plan year.

  2. Agent quality determines whether members end up in the right
    plan, and the consequences of getting it wrong extend well beyond the call.

    A poorly trained agent does not just deliver a poor member experience—they set up a poor plan selection, and the damage surfaces later: unexpected out-of-pocket costs, coverage gaps, and members who switch or file complaints.

    In 2025's AEP, 16% of non-SNP Medicare Advantage members switched plans voluntarily and another 6% were forced to switch following benefit changes they did not understand at enrollment. Agent quality is not a soft metric; it is the variable most directly connected to member satisfaction and plan profitability, and the one most payers underinvest in.

  3. Back-end technology investments improve system efficiency
    but do not improve front-end conversations.

    Technology and compliance infrastructure are necessary, but they are not sufficient. No claims system or IVR helps a member choose between two plans with different network structures. What bridges that gap is the human component: the agent's knowledge, judgment, and skill applied in the moment of the conversation. Underinvesting in that layer also carries regulatory exposure—increased CMS scrutiny in 2026 means inconsistent medical enrollment practices now carry elevated audit risk.

  4. First-call resolution drops under volume.

    Members call back, escalate, or abandon enrollment entirely, with each outcome a measurable loss. And unlike other contact center programs, the damage from an unresolved AEP call does not show up immediately. It appears months later in dissatisfaction scores, Star Rating declines, and plan bonus payments that don’t materialize.

    CMS scores member experience measures annually: for 2025, only seven Medicare Advantage plans received an overall 5-star rating, down from 38 the prior year. A poor AEP season does not just affect the enrollment window. It shapes the following year's competitive position.

What Operational Readiness for AEP Actually Requires

Closing the gap requires operational models built specifically for AEP surge conditions. Returning, Medicare-trained agents outperform seasonal hires on conversion rate, compliance adherence, and member satisfaction because institutional knowledge is built over seasons, not trained in two weeks. The best contact center operations reinforce this by aligning agent skill profiles to program requirements, then hiring, certifying, and measuring that distinction before medical enrollment opens. AI accelerates the model—but only when the agents using it are already prepared. When agent quality, retention, and scalability are treated as primary variables, the right operational model delivers:

  • Faster ramp - returning agents require significantly less onboarding time
  • Stronger conversion - agents who know the plans and the member profile convert at higher rates
  • Scalability without compliance risk - operations built on proven agents scale rapidly
  • Better member outcomes - the right plan selection reduces downstream issues

The Time to Act Is Now

Every day spent without a confirmed partner strategy, a retention plan for returning agents, and a compliance framework in place is a day closer to peak season with the gap still open. AEP does not forgive late preparation—it exposes it. The payers who consistently outperform don’t start getting ready when enrollment opens; they’ve started months earlier already.